Research & Publications

READING RESEARCH RESPONSIBLY

Move from a plain-language summary to the original evidence

The research index highlights work on HIV self-testing, PrEP awareness, U=U knowledge, online-to-offline care, digital interventions, and health informatics. Open an individual record for its central question, relevance, possible application, authors, and publication source. These summaries are navigation aids for readers who want to understand the topic before opening a technical publication.

For academic citation, clinical guidance, programme design, or policy work, use the original DOI or publication and examine the study design, participant characteristics, setting, measures, analysis, findings, uncertainty, conflicts of interest, and limitations. A research protocol describes intended methods and must not be treated as completed results. A conference abstract may provide substantially less detail than a full peer-reviewed paper.

Findings from one sample or setting do not automatically apply to every population, clinic, age group, or digital platform. Consider local resources, eligibility, privacy, accessibility, and community preferences before applying an approach. The summaries do not provide individual medical advice and do not add results absent from the cited source. Report a discrepancy with the exact page and source link so it can be checked.